Medicare Fraud

Every year, we lose billions of dollars to fraud in federal and state health care programs. Every dollar we lose to fraud and abuse is a dollar that is not available to provide home care to seniors, to treat HIV and AIDS, to immunize children, and to discover new treatments for cancer and other diseases. Some fraud schemes even pose a direct threat to the health and safety of patients. Many instances of health care fraud sug­gest that existing control systems do not work the way we imagine they should. Often the manner in which schemes are revealed suggests detection is more luck than system. Whistleblower lawsuits have exposed billing by health care providers for services not rendered, billing for products not delivered, misrepresenting services, unbundling services, billing for medically unnecessary services, duplicate billing, increasing units of service which are subject to a payment rate, falsifying cost reports resulting in increased payment to the health care provider, kickbacks, and on and on. Healthcare fraud is still going strong and this blog is intended to keep readers up to date with all healthcare fraud related news and to provide commentary when warranted. This blog also contains an array of laws and regulations concerning healthcare fraud set out in an easy to read format.

Teaching Hospital Settles Physician Billing Case

by Nolan and Auerbach on July 16, 2009

In the July 13 edition of the Report on Medicare Compliance, Editor Nina Armstrong quoted Ken Nolan in her article titled, “Teaching Hospital Settles Physician Billing Case, Signs Second Agreement with OIG.” The article reported that Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center in Shreveport (LSUHSC-S) recently settled a dispute alleging it billed Medicare for surgery on behalf of physicians who were not present when residents performed the procedures.

 

LSUHSC-S agreed to pay more than $700,000 to resolve the False Claims Act allegations. The complaint was initiated by two employees-turned-whistleblowers who both plan to file another suit to collect lost wages, benefits, and damages for their damaged reputations.

 

Ken was quoted on the connection between this settlement and Physicians at Teaching Hospitals (PATH), the Department of Justice (DOJ) and Office of Inspector General’s (OIG) national enforcement project in the area of teaching physicians. While the goal of PATH was to target major offenders, Ken does not find it surprising that smaller offenders like LSUHSC-S are showing up with independent whistleblower cases. This is one of the several beneficial scenarios to taxpayers that the qui tam law was intended to capture. Ken also highlighted that many settlements are now originated with whistleblowers, instead of the DOJ or OIG like with PATH.

Leave a Comment