LSUHSC-S agreed to pay more than $700,000 to resolve the False Claims Act allegations. The complaint was initiated by two employees-turned-whistleblowers who both plan to file another suit to collect lost wages, benefits, and damages for their damaged reputations.

Ken was quoted on the connection between this settlement and Physicians at Teaching Hospitals (PATH), the Department of Justice (DOJ) and Office of Inspector General’s (OIG) national enforcement project in the area of teaching physicians. While the goal of PATH was to target major offenders, Ken does not find it surprising that smaller offenders like LSUHSC-S are showing up with independent whistleblower cases. This is one of the several beneficial scenarios to taxpayers that the qui tam law was intended to capture. Ken also highlighted that many settlements are now originated with whistleblowers, instead of the DOJ or OIG like with PATH.

The settlement was the second time UMDNJ paid the government for the double-billing scheme. The first was in 2005 when the hospital paid $4.9 million to the state of New Jersey to settle criminal charges.

In the end, UMDNJ ended up paying nearly $7 million total for the scheme, but, according to Marcella Auerbach, managing partner at Nolan & Auerbach, the hospital could have avoided the lengthy and costly litigation and saved millions, if it had acted differently.

According to Auerbach, a former federal prosecutor who now exclusively represents whistleblowers in healthcare fraud cases, UMDNJ’s in-house attorney discovered the hospital and its physicians were billing for the same services back in 2001-before any whistle was blown. The lawyer brought the issue to the hospital’s attention, but the management looked the other way, and continued to double-bill for the three years following the warning, he says.

The fact that UMDNJ knew about the double-billing, knew it was illegal, and continued to do it, is what makes the case so interesting. According to Auerbach, the hospital could have saved millions if it ceased double-billing and came clean to the government through a self-disclosure.

“It’s a bet,” Auerbach says. “They are betting on the fact they won’t get caught.”

However, UMDNJ hit one too many times and ended up going bust. The man who busted the hospital is Steven Simring, MD, who will collect $801,000 for his efforts.

Based on the details of the case, Auerbach was not surprised to see a doctor blow the whistle on the hospital. Evidence shows that there were many discussions about the double-billing in which doctors expressed concern. Auerbach says it comes as no surprise that Simring would come forward and blow the whistle rather than risk being prosecuted himself.

Auerbach, who has extensive experience in whistleblower cases, says the gambler’s mind-set is common in whistleblower cases. Rather than play by the rules and fess up, many facilities try to sweep problems under the rug and pretend they never happened. Some even go one step further. Auerbach says many times concerned employees will raise a compliance concern only to be handed a pink slip for their trouble, which raises another legal problem.

“These people are fired for bringing points up,” Auerbach says, “Then they come to us and they have two claims.”

Auerbach says this case can be seen as a message to healthcare leaders. The DOJ is saying take any compliance concerns presented by employees or legal council very seriously and, when appropriate, self-disclose. The alternative is a lengthy, expensive, public whistleblower case.

For the entire article, go to: http://www.healthleadersmedia.com/content/234437/topic/WS_HLM2_FIN/Doublebilling-Settlement-Highlights-Whistleblower-Concerns.html

For more information about qui tam law and health care fraud, contact Nolan and Auerbach, PA.

According to the DOJ press release, the settlement resolves allegations that the St. Paul, Minn.-based hospitals overcharged Medicare from 2002 to 2007 by thousands of dollars each time they performed kyphoplasty, a minimally-invasive procedure used to treat certain spinal fractures that often are due to osteoporosis. The procedure can be performed safely as an outpatient surgery, but the government contends that the HealthEast hospitals performed the procedure on an inpatient basis in order to increase their Medicare billings.

The settlement with HealthEast follows the government’s May 2008 settlement with Medtronic Spine LLC, corporate successor to Kyphon Inc. Medtronic Spine paid $75 million to settle allegations that the company defrauded Medicare by counseling hospital providers to perform kyphoplasty procedures as an inpatient procedure.

The qui tam or whistleblower lawsuit against the HealthEast hospitals was brought under the False Claims Act.

To read the full press release, go to: http://www.usdoj.gov/opa/pr/2009/May/09-civ-497.html.

For more information about qui tam law and health care fraud, contact Nolan and Auerbach, PA.

The government alleged that, between January 2001 and August 2003, Methodist improperly inflated charges for inpatient and outpatient care to make its costs for providing such care appear greater than they actually were, and thereby obtain outlier payments from Medicare that it was not entitled to receive, according to a DOJ press release.

For the full press release, go to: http://www.usdoj.gov/opa/pr/2009/March/09-civ-274.html.

For more information about Medicare fraud, contact Nolan and Auerbach, PA.

To read more click here or visit Nolan & Auerbach law firm’s website.

To read more click here.