Medicare Fraud

Every year, we lose billions of dollars to fraud in federal and state health care programs. Every dollar we lose to fraud and abuse is a dollar that is not available to provide home care to seniors, to treat HIV and AIDS, to immunize children, and to discover new treatments for cancer and other diseases. Some fraud schemes even pose a direct threat to the health and safety of patients. Many instances of health care fraud sug­gest that existing control systems do not work the way we imagine they should. Often the manner in which schemes are revealed suggests detection is more luck than system. Whistleblower lawsuits have exposed billing by health care providers for services not rendered, billing for products not delivered, misrepresenting services, unbundling services, billing for medically unnecessary services, duplicate billing, increasing units of service which are subject to a payment rate, falsifying cost reports resulting in increased payment to the health care provider, kickbacks, and on and on. Healthcare fraud is still going strong and this blog is intended to keep readers up to date with all healthcare fraud related news and to provide commentary when warranted. This blog also contains an array of laws and regulations concerning healthcare fraud set out in an easy to read format.

Stark Violations May Result in Exclusion of Tenet Hospital from Federal Programs

by Nolan and Auerbach on May 10, 2006

The “Stark” statute, 42 U.S.C. §1395nn, is also known as the Physician Self-Referral Law or Section 1877 of the Social Security Act. The Stark law was intended to prevent physicians from profiting (actually or potentially) from their own referrals. The Stark statute acts prospectively, i.e., it prohibits relationships that have been demonstrated to encourage over-utilization. Because it is a strict liability statute, there is no need to show knowledge or intent.

Medicare and Medicaid programs depend on physicians and other health care professionals to exercise independent judgment in the best interests of patients. Financial incentives tied to referrals have a tendency to corrupt the healthcare delivery system in ways that harm the federal programs and their beneficiaries. Corruption of medical decision-making can result when a physician refers a patient to a provider on the basis of the physician’s financial self-interest instead of the patient’s best interests. Restrictions on the practice of self-referral exist at both the state and federal levels.

Medical directorships, interest free loans/forgiveness of debts, illegal recruitment arrangements and improper discounts in the form of professional courtesy, may represent additional financial windfalls to physicians, resulting in hospital referrals and a violation of the “Stark” statute. A Stark scenario may also be present when a hospital circumvents potentially compliant contracts by providing outside of what appear to be legitimate contracts, office space, renovations, equipment, furniture, housekeeping services, office supplies, copy and fax machines, telephone, utility and transcription services to referring physicians for free or less than fair market value.

Tagged as: , ,

Leave a Comment